Quote by MarissaPlease read this thread before making any further posts in the Deletion Complaints section of the forum:
Read this FIRST

Quote by OmikamiImpressive work, I have seen Vue at work and its not easy to always get exactly like you want it.+fav
Which version of Vue did you use (4.0 or 5.0)?

I use version 4.0 :3 And thanks for the comment and fav!

merged: 12-24-2006 ~ 03:50am

Quote by OmikamiYour welcome! And thank you for answering my question.
I don't know if you know this yet but they e-on software have lunch a pre-release of Vue D'Esprit 6 which look very promising. Here is the link:
Vue 6 Esprit
If you haven't done so, Cornucopiaan interesting (specially the forums and gallery) that you may want to see.

Ah, thanks! I didn't know about Vue 6. I'll have to look further into it sometime! :3

Merci en avance pour m'aider, je te le repayerai un de ses quatre.

Quote by Omikami

Quote by kayo04Are you say you agree with XicerChrist? if so then can you explain to me.

No, I'm answering your question in his place since its so obvious what his answer is going to be.

hehehe sorry about that..didn't mean to attack you like that.. I hope I didn't offen you or anything. I thought you side with XicerChriston this same sex thing. heheheheehe

Hey there, Omikami , thanks for the comment on my Just an Ordinary Day . Glad you like it. Have a nice day.

Quote by omikamiIts interesting how mere mortals actually think they can understand us would you say Yu-huang?
Not only does she thinks that beings such as ourselves takes thing personally but actually thinks that we pursue fights with lower beings. How sad.

yu-huang told me about that certain quote.
If I had an opinion about someone, I'd also have the courage to tell her in person.

ever heard of "superiority complex" ?

Quote by Omikami

Quote by vatican92Well he can just f*ck himself and go to hell....

Interesting words comming from a man of God.

Hey who says Christians can't say go to hell?

Quote by OmikamiHello LordWe,
I'm sorry to disturb you but I notice that many old threds that are more than four weeks old have been bumped and moderators have been closing them. My question is can members help moderator spot those bump thread and tell them or should I just let them find it in their own?
Take care,
Omikami

If you find a very old thread that has recently been bumped, feel free to report it, and if the moderator feels it is necessary he/she will close it. The forum moderators are not online 24/7 so a few may slip through the cracks. It's possible the thread may be spotted and closed before your report is processed though, but it wouldn't hurt to go ahead and report them.

merged: 08-21-2006 ~ 10:04am

Quote by OmikamiI see. Thank you very much for the quick reply and have a good day.
Oh, by the way should I report via PM or guest book or something else?

Sorry, I didn't notice your merged post. Just report the post that bumped the thread (as in, click the 'report' link next to the 'quote' link at the bottom of a post), and give a reason like "I'm reporting this because the thread has been dead for 5 weeks before this member chimed in." or "This member bumped a thread which has been inactive for a very long time for no good reason."

Remember to give the link to the full thread.

Keep in mind that sometimes old threads are allowed to be bumped if the post is important, but most of the time you will see things like "Yeah I think so too.", so in that case, report them.

Quote by Omikami

Quote by OdeenaYou're free to abide by these rules, but I think most of what you said is absurd... Take the limited time to talk on the phone, for instance. 5 minutes? WTF? Ever since my best friend moved to another city, we spend hours talking on the phone and catching up. It's a way to keep our relation from growing cold. Same goes for my family when I'm away and I have no other means to contact them. Not to mention that I also use my phone for business conversations, and you can't put a limit on that -- when your boss calls you to tell you exactly what he wants on a given project, for instance, you can't cut that off.

He did not say that you should not you use phones anymore. Only that you use cell phone for emergencies or something important (e.g. business). If you want to talk with you friends or family you should do so in the privacy of your own home. I know it is not my business what you do with it, but in my own humble opinion I think he has a point on this aspect.

My bad for misspelling... I was refering to cellphones in my post as well I agree that you should call your friends etc. from home when you can, but what do you do when you're away from home? Like waiting at a train station, or on the train, or in other such situations.

Quote by Omikami

Quote by Spystreak
We don't promote people to those titles because they don't exist. The only classes we have are as follows:
Member
Restricted Member
Mute Member
Banned Member
Elite Member
Moderator
Super Moderator
Administrator

Super Moderators?
I never heard of them before. Do they have special privileges that normal Moderator don't have?

That's because none have ever been assigned. Mt does not have any member that is a super moderator. As such the only person that would know what powers they would have are Sheqel since he is admin.

Quote by OmikamiFor all of you religious people, if you believe in Bible literally do you honestly believe that everyone originally came from Adam and Eve?
The bible explicitly condemns incest, at least in certain configurations.

The idea is ridiculous. By science we learn that too much incest would lead to deformity and eventually you would have mess up kids.

The Bible statement, in Acts 17:26, that "[God] made out of one man every nation of men, to dwell upon the entire surface of the earth" is acknowledged by Bible students to be backed up by the facts. John Peter Lange's Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, a work that considers the arguments of a great number of scholars in an analytical and explanatory discussion of the Bible, says on page 191:

"That the Scriptures neither know nor will know of pre-Adamites . . . nor of various primitive aboriginal races, appears not only from Genesis i. and ii., but also from the consistent presumption and assertion of the entire Holy Writ; for example, Matthew xix.4; Acts xvii.26; 1 Cor. xv.47. . . . The original unity of the human race coincides with the doctrine of the unity of the fall of man in Adam, and the unity of the redemption in Christ. . . . The greatest naturalists have mostly declared themselves against the originality of different human races . . . in regard to the alleged fruitfulness of sexual combinations among the various races, the proof of such fruitfulness is justly pronounced one of the strongest proofs of unity. . . . The autochthonic theory [that living things (in this case humans) were formed or occurred in the places where they were found] [can]not deny the fact that the origin of the various types of men points back to a common home in Asia."

This statement about the unity of the human race (that all are one race, one created kind, not "aboriginal" tribes or nations in the sense that they were separately created or separately originating) coincides with the Bible statements: "Through one man sin entered into the world and death through sin," and, "just as in Adam all are dying, so also in the Christ all will be made alive." Yet the Creator has arranged, through the countless genetic combinations, to provide in mankind the most delightful and interesting variations. (Romans 5:12; 1 Corinthians 15:22)

Was God fostering what is now called "incest" by arranging matters so that the first children of Adam would marry one another--brothers marrying sisters? No. For, in Adam's original perfect state his children would have been born in perfection. (Deuteronomy 32:4) There would have been no family weaknesses to be passed on and accentuated by the marriage of near relatives, as is the case today, when the sinful human race has greatly deteriorated and many genetic defects exist. Even after Adam had sinned, his descendants lived as long as 969 years in the days before the Flood. (Genesis 5:27)

Accordingly, it took a long time for genetic defects to become so numerous and so grouped in family lines that it became dangerous to the offspring for close relatives to marry. Even Abraham, some 2,000 years after the creation of Adam, married his half sister. (Genesis 20:12) Not until God gave the Mosaic law (about 500 years later) did He prohibit close family marriage unions among the people of Israel. (Leviticus 18:6-18)

The Bible record does indicate that Cain married one of his sisters (Genesis 4:17; 5:4) and that Abram married his half sister. (Genesis 20:12) But later, in the Law given through Moses, such marriage unions were specifically forbidden. (Leviticus 18:9, 11) They are not permitted among Christians today. Marriage to a close relative results in a more-than-average probability that damaging hereditary factors will be passed on to their offspring...

Why was brother-and-sister marriage not inappropriate at the beginning of mankind's history? God created Adam and Eve perfect and purposed that all humankind descend from them. (Genesis 1:28; 3:20) Obviously some marrying of close relatives, especially within the first few generations, would occur. Even after sin made its appearance, there was relatively little danger of marked deformities in the children during early generations, because the human race was much closer to the perfection that had been enjoyed by Adam and Eve. This is attested to by the longevity of people then. (See Genesis 5:3-8; 25:7.) But about 2,500 years after Adam became a sinner, God prohibited incestuous marriage. This served to safeguard the offspring and it elevated the sexual morality of Jehovah's servants above that of people around them who were then engaging in all manner of depraved practices. (See Leviticus 18:2-18)

Quote by Omikami

Since you posted here I assume that you are one of these people who "don't have anything else to do."

haha...youre right! for the time being... yeah i am free. ( finally)

Quote: If you wrote this you must have missed the point of the whole thread. It is suppose to be long since it is a debate. And you can acutally learn something by reading those "long posts".

gee, im sorry i missed the point.

Quote: But you are right that they should give stronger arguments. Perhaps you could demostrate you're incredible skills of creating strong argument since your the one who suggested and even maybe give your own opinion or take a stand.

nah....i have no such skills. so sorry if offended you. didnt mean to. my apologies.

have a nice day! and happy MT-ing.